21/03/26

Klosteria bodomorphis Mylnikov & Nikolaev 2003

Klosteria bodomorphis is a free-living protist belonging to the Neobodonidae family, which, as I'll explain later, is related to dangerous kinetoplastid organisms... well, it's not that surprising, but still.

These drawings are free to use and you probably found them on Wikimedia Commons. They are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Free use for non-commercial purposes. You also have to give credit every time you use an image. "DOTkamina 2026" is fine, I think.

Sources: formally just one: "The taxonomic position of Klosteria bodomorphis gen. and sp. nov. (Kinetoplastida) based on ultrastructure and SSU rRNA gene sequence analysis" by Sergey I. Nikolaev, Alexander P. Mylnikov, Cedric Berney, Jose Fahrni, Nikolai Petrov and Jan Pawlowski, Protistology 3 (2), 126-135 (2003)... or simply Nikolaev et al. (2003). It's literally the article where this species is described. Although, to be honest, it was a bit complicated because there were strange concepts I didn't quite understand. That's why I also consulted this book chapter on kinetoplastid microanatomy: "Kinetoplastea" by Gibson, W. (2016).


So... Klosteria bodomorphis belongs to the family Neobodonidae, order Neobodonida, subclass Metakinetoplastina, in the class Kinetoplastea. I don't know what is more unnerving: that Kinetoplastea is included in the phylum Euglenozoa (meaning they are distantly related to the famous microalgae Euglena), or that along with Neobodonida, which includes free-living species that eat bacteria, it encompasses other clades where the titans, the horror of many, reside, such as Trypanosoma and Leishmania (in the order Trypanosomatida).

But with Klosteria bodomorphis, you have nothing to worry about. This is a free-living organism that was isolated from samples taken from the Baltic Sea shoreline, near the town of Kloster, Germany, in December 1994. It's an organism that feeds on bacteria—which ones? I don't know. In the illustration, I depict a specimen of Aerobacter (Klebsiella) aerogenes as prey, and within its food vacuoles, I have drawn amorphous pinkish blobs representing partially digested bacteria of that species. The reason for choosing this specific species is that Nikolaev et al. (2003) used this bacterium as a food source in laboratory culture. However, it is unknown exactly which bacterial species or clades it might consume in nature.

But focusing on its anatomy, I'll begin by saying that it has two heterodynamic flagella: the anterior one measures 12 µm and the posterior one 17 µm. At the end of each flagellum are short, tapering tips known as acronemes. The anterior flagellum is covered with mastigonemes measuring 2 to 2.5 µm. Both flagella are covered by a layer of condensed glycocalyx, but I haven't depicted that.

You already know the typical flagellar configuration: 9+2 (nine doublets of microtubules surrounding two central single microtubules), enclosed by the plasma membrane. More generally, flagella "emerge" from the cytoplasm. In Klosteria bodomorphis, the flagella emerge from a kind of "depression" on the cell surface, surrounding the lower portions of the external flagella. This "depression" is known as a "flagellar pocket," which is shallow and located subapically. According to Nikolaev et al. (2003), flagellar pockets containing four flagella have been found... which is quite disturbing.

Equally disturbing is the microtubule system identified using electron microscopy, which I have represented more accurately based on the text by Gibson (2016). First, it's worth noting that the flagella, or rather, the 9+2 configuration, originate from the basal bodies. The basal bodies are also anchored by flagellar roots (abbreviated "fr" in the image). Hell yeah, fr!

The flagellar root of the anterior flagellum (that is, the one that originates from the basal body of the previous flagellum) is made of 2 to 3 microtubules and then gives rise to the dorsal submembrane band (simply called the "dorsal band"), which is made of at least 25 microtubules. This band, according to Gibson (2016), extends along the entire dorsal side of the cell.

Simultaneously, the flagellar root of the posterior flagellum emerges from the basal body of the posterior flagellum. This root is composed of six microtubules and extends posteriorly (presumably towards the ventral side of the cell) to form the ventral submembrane band (or simply the "ventral band"), composed of 27 microtubules, which runs along the entire ventral side of the cell.

Between the basal bodies are two microtubules that connect them, which I have labeled as the "fibrillar connection" in the illustration. Another interesting microtubular structure is the so-called "MTR band" (microtubular reinforced band), composed of four to five microtubules. It originates at the surface of the flagellar pocket and extends to the cytopharynx, where it is supplemented by additional microtubules. I have depicted two additional microtubules in the illustration, but Nikolaev et al. (2003) do not specify the actual number. I chose that number because I think I see two more than the 5 of MTR (I hope there are 5) in Illustration 16, but in Illustrations 14 and 15 I think I see more... so I don't know xd.

The shapes of the bands are purely illustrative, but their placement is based verbatim on Nikolaev et al. (2003), and primarily visually on Gibson (2016) Figure 3, and Frolov et al. 2021.

The organism has a cytostome (the "mouth" through which food, bacteria, enters), which is essentially the opening through which food enters. This opening connects to the rest of the invagination, the cytopharynx, a tunnel-like structure measuring 1.8 to 2.3 µm. The lower part of the cytopharynx is surrounded by vesicles. This can be called the "cytostome-cytopharynx complex," and it is simply a very complex cellular feature for phagocytosis, since it is in the cytopharynx that food is packaged into food vacuoles. These vacuoles are directed toward the hind part of the cell (the posterior part).

The organism also has a Golgi apparatus, which is located near the basal bodies. The shape of the Golgi apparatus in the illustration is more schematic than realistic. The nucleus with nucleolus, obviously (although I haven't depicted the nucleolus in this image), "lies at the level of the bottom of the flagellar pocket and at the end of the cytopharynx," according to Nikolaev et al. (2003). They also say that the nucleus is vesicular. I don't know exactly what that means; in (cancer) cytology, it refers to cells with loosely packed chromatin, which under the microscope appear to have nothing inside... but I don't know. In my illustration, you'll see that the nucleus has some dark ornaments in the center and others surrounding it. You can assume the one in the center is the nucleolus. This decision was based on Nikolaev et al. (2003): Figure 17. Around the nucleus is the endoplasmic reticulum, both smooth and rough, and its shapes and existence are speculative (I assume they must exist because they are common in all eukaryotic cells).

The mitochondrion have an almost speculative shape. As can be seen in Nikolaev et al. (2003): Figure 18, appears to extend across a significant portion of the cell. The authors debate whether it is truly a single structure or if it might be more branched. I have chosen to depict it as slightly branched. The authors describe the mitochondria as having discoid cristae. The cristae are invaginations of the inner mitochondrial membrane, and their discoid form refers to the fact that these invaginations are shaped like discs with small "peduncles" (pedicellate, see Pánek et al. (2020): Figures 2A and 2F) when the section is longitudinal, and like sausages or cylindrical "bacilli" when the section is transverse. I have represented them almost as if they were seen in transverse section and pedicellate, in the mitochondrion of my illustration.

Now, I mentioned earlier that Klosteria bodomorphis belongs to the large order Kinetoplastea, and you'll read that the most important characteristic of this group is the kinetoplast, a mass of DNA arranged in maxicircles and minicircles (Wang et al. 2025), located within the mitochondria in a specific region, usually near the basal bodies. But this isn't a mandatory feature for all kinetoplastids; it's actually a structure that is repeated in some, and especially studied in species that are parasitic to humans. For other kinetoplastid species, we can speak of "kinetoplasty," a term that encompasses other forms of organization of kinetoplastid DNA (kDNA).

One such form is pankinetoplasty, described as bundles of kDNA isotropically distributed throughout part or all of the mitochondrial lumen (Gibson 2016: Figure 1i)... think of it as more or less elongated groups of kDNA that are present throughout, or almost throughout, the interior of the mitochondrion. In cell biology, "isotropic" refers to the fact that, in any part of a structure, the properties (I suppose physical, shape, optical, chemical, or whatever) will be more or less similar (New World Encyclopedia n.d.).

According to Nikolaev et al. (2003), Klosteria bodomorphis has little DNA within the mitochondrion that can be interpreted as kDNA, and if so, the most appropriate classification would be pankinetoplasty. The reason they give is that the kDNA fibers do not occupy a very prominent space within the mitochondria. The pankinetoplast (and any other type of kinetoplast, really) should appear as dark spots or aggregates within the mitochondria under an electron microscope. I only manage to observe this more or less in Nikolaev et al. (2003): Figures 16 and 18. I imagine these small spots are slightly darker than the cristae... I have represented the supposed "pankinetoplast" of K. bodomorphis as more or less elongated spots, somewhat distributed throughout the mitochondrion... but it is possible that in reality they are even smaller, more insignificant, less observable or noteworthy spots.

Finally, storage substance granules measuring 0.10 to 0.35 µm in diameter have also been observed in Klosteria bodomorphis. These, along with symbiotic bacteria, one of the most cursed aspects of the organism, measure 0.3 to 0.6 µm in diameter. The authors noted cell division in some of these bacteria, and I have indeed depicted such bacterial division in my illustration.

However, this isn't the end. I've forgotten about the trichocysts. In Klosteria bodomorphis, these are elongated and cylindrical. Length: 1.2 to 1.9 µm, diameter: 0.15 µm, with an internal rod of 0.6 to 0.77 µm, which I've represented as a darker area within the trichocysts. Nikolaev et al. (2003) mention that they are located near the ventral side of the flagellar pocket. I suppose I've erred here because I've depicted them more dorsally, near the ventral band. In fact, this is clearer in the image attached next to the main one, titled "Close-up of the flagellar zone," (the image above, without labels) which is entirely inspired by Nikolaev et al. (2003): Figure 13. So... feel free to discuss whatever you like in the comments. I'd be happy to see corrections and possible improvements. My hand hurts right now, and I have a trip planned where I'll be dragging myself along to see if my final project makes any progress, so lol.

There are 8 to 9 trichocysts arranged in a row, also known as extrusomes. This group is known as a "trichocyst battery." In the main image, only two trichocysts are visible, but that doesn't mean there are only two... they're assumed to be viewed from the side, and those two are "covering" the others.



I guess that's all I have to say. I wasn't expecting to do this illustration, because the organism seemed strange to me. I don't even know how I came across this organism; I think I was reading about trichocysts for a previous illustration. I don't know, I just got a sudden urge and said, "Let's do it, or I'll die." Or maybe it was out of pride. Or perhaps it was out of morbid curiosity to see if I'll finally reach 100 illustrations, or even 20. That number 20 looks pretty promising.

17/03/26

I Wish it Would Rain Down

 


A gentle night of aggressive rain.
My computer just got back from repairs.
The graphics card almost exploded from the heat.

I don't have the means to afford another computer or any repairs.
So I just have to endure it as long as I can.

Keep creating.






S̴h̴e̶ ̸p̶r̴o̸b̵a̴b̵l̷y̷ ̴w̴o̴u̴l̸d̷n̸'̷t̸ ̷h̷a̵v̵e̷ ̷c̶a̸r̸e̴d̵.̶

Phil Collins' music is good right now.

It's an eerie moment.
I have so many important things to do.
But I still continue with what I love to do.

Drawing organisms.

At least for now, in the present of this post.

While I remember the times I wrote to her hoping for some reaction, a laughing emoji after ages without a reply.

How can she be with such toxic people, and pretend not to notice?


I don't think I've mentioned it in another post, but yes, I cut off all communication with girl M. Literally. It's been almost a month since I've heard from her. I don't even know what's become of her. I assume that if I had continued forcing the interaction, I would still be stuck wondering what I should write to get her attention. I suppose. If I told her what happened to my computer, a slight "hahaha" and nothing more. No interest.

Sometimes I presume that I've proven she really didn't care because since I stopped writing to her, she hasn't said a single word. But that's actually because I had blocked her. Any message she might have sent, well, I simply didn't receive it. I hope it was some message offering help with something, as it always has been. 

I'm not going to repeat the same old shit about it being that and not an effort to evolve the interaction into something more, because in reality, I was just deluding myself, thinking there was something more, being the one bothering her by sending memes, asking how her day was, and so on, with the attempt... no, with the certainty, that she neither cared about it, nor gained anything from it, and that it actually annoyed her.


It's stopped raining. Now everything is silent. "Phil Collins - I Wish It Would Rain Down" plays loudly as those memories continue to fade, blurring into artificial recollections where everything was better and worked.

I have a lot of work to do. 
My university just threatened me, saying I have to submit one last course performance report, or I'll face some unknown sanction. 

On top of that, I need to make some progress on my final year project, which I'm already fed up with not making any damn progress on. And pretending it's all the university's fault, because the truth is, those bastards have thrown all sorts of obstacles in my way, from methodological ones to questioning the stupid topic I chose—I don't want to talk about it. Because I haven't done anything wrong, and I'm not doing anything wrong now. 

"Yes, yes, I am a responsible, diligent, and committed person" is a typical empty resume line, or rather, the typical empty line on my resumes to say that I'll basically sell myself for a few bucks. When in reality I don't fit those descriptions. The director of the museum where the samples I analyze are housed got incredibly angry because I wasn't making significant progress on the final project. 

It's an interesting contrast, you know? One day I said to myself: I think I've finally found my true calling: protists. You know. Reading about them so I can draw them, which isn't easy, I invest many hours reading in depth (or more or less in depth) articles and other sources that explain aspects of cellular microanatomy to see how to represent a structure. And I'm not going to get paid for it! No money, of course. I do it all so that it's free, open access, and trusting that people will mention my name as the author, and avoid being forgotten.

It's a contrast, when I genuinely love something and put my heart into it. And then there's my project, which has me completely exhausted. I don't feel like finishing it; I just want it to magically write itself, for the pain of presenting in front of the jury to be over, for me to get my degree, and say: I did it, just like that.



ლ(⋋·⋌)ლ

Besides that, I have to make some serious corrections to the illustration of Dolichomastix tenuilepis because I'm a total crap and I've forgotten to properly read the spatial orientations and I've drawn a lot of things backward. I MUST fix that. 

Additionally, I have to finish a drawing of a kinetoplastid organism. It's one of the ones I'm most proud of because it was from an article I didn't want to read at all, but I told myself, "Screw it. Let's do it." And I'm almost finished because I discovered some things that could improve the drawing's accuracy.

Aaaah... drawings.

I remember when girl M asked me what I was doing. "I draw... I draw the structures of microorganisms." And what did I expect? I don't know. I wasn't asking her to be a genius and complement me. But I did expect appreciation, understanding, tenderness. That I was being observed. Like an anime couple where the protagonist's crush is interested in the manga he reads in the purest way possible, simply because he's him and he's great. And because he's good and takes care of her and attends to her quirks.

It also reminds me of the first time someone was interested in one of my drawings, a crush from a bygone era, girl P. But that's a story for another post that I probably won't write.


Do you know what I have received? The Graphic Designer Barnstar!!!!

\(`0´)/


/╲/\〳 ᴼᴼ ౪ ᴼᴼ 〵/\╱\

I consider it one of the most prestigious recognitions a user can receive in the Wikipedia ecosystem. It's something I've dreamed about quite a few times, especially when looking at other users' profiles and seeing their Barnstars. "Wow, those people are truly amazing and they do something that matters." And I can... now I can think about it, think that I too am part of that exclusive social group. And it's wonderful! It might sound lame, but I didn't expect to get that barnstar status with so little effort.

And that's why I must continue. 

One more illustration. 

Little by little. 


Until I burn out, until something stops me in my tracks.





I wish there was a certain girl, so I could celebrate with her. And not be judged. Or ignored in reality. "Reality."

But... enough with the edgy, dark, and cloying writing. I must finish these illustrations.